On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 13/01/2014 15:02, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > >> Alp, others, >> >> Now that there is no urgent issue I'd like to return to the discussion >> about names with "__" prefix in sanitizer run-times. >> > > If you're OK to conditionalize the code so it's only defined in sanitizer > builds, that's fine and as Sean pointed out there's already plenty of > precedent -- it's what every software project does to define "__" prefixed > weak link functions like libc malloc hooks. >
This discussion is so vastly far from the best use of any of our time. Let's just restore the name we had before and wrap the definition in __has_feature(leak_sanitizer). I think that will make everyone happy. OK?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
