Hi David, I think Paul's assumptions are correct. Two distinct problems can manifest itself via the same assertion message.
What we tried to fix here is the regression in r169489. r169489 was a very big patch, where the bitfield access and bitfield memory layout was re-written. The test that we provided works with the r169488 (and eariler) and fails with the r169489 (and later). I just checked that the testcase that David provided was failing all along. Basically, what we are trying to fix here is a new regression introduced in r169489. I think it worth filing a different bug using David's testcase. http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2560 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
