Do you not even want an // expected-no-diagnostics or -Werror here?

On Thu Jan 16 2014 at 4:13:08 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Author: hans
> Date: Thu Jan 16 18:04:43 2014
> New Revision: 199442
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=199442&view=rev
> Log:
> ms-intrin.cpp: no need for -verify anymore
>
> Modified:
>     cfe/trunk/test/Headers/ms-intrin.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Headers/ms-intrin.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/
> Headers/ms-intrin.cpp?rev=199442&r1=199441&r2=199442&view=diff
> ============================================================
> ==================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Headers/ms-intrin.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Headers/ms-intrin.cpp Thu Jan 16 18:04:43 2014
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple i386-pc-win32 -target-cpu pentium4 \
>  // RUN:     -fms-extensions -fms-compatibility -fmsc-version=1700 \
> -// RUN:     -ffreestanding -verify %s
> +// RUN:     -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only %s
>
>  // Intrin.h needs size_t, but -ffreestanding prevents us from getting it
> from
>  // stddef.h.  Work around it with this typedef.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to