The clang side looks fine, but there's very little context as to what's
going on here so not possible to review it just like that.
The patch rebases to clang ToT fine but doesn't build due to missing RNG
facilities in LLVM -- could you give a refresher of the status of that
with a link? It's been long enough that not everyone remembers the
discussion.
The last I remember of the discussion was that linking to OpenSSL can be
painful, and it doesn't feel right as a dependency. What are the other
options for pseudo RNG and could we have a simpler scheme?
That'll help get things moving.
Alp.
On 22/01/2014 21:48, Julian Lettner wrote:
Is there anything stopping this from going forward?
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1803
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
--
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
