Ping?

  @Dmitri Gribenko
  The name of the added warning is clearly debatable and in particular I do not 
have on strong opinion on them (especially regarding the backend- prefix).
  I did not find any equivalent for the inline-asm diagnostic in GCC, thus 
there is nothing to match here AFAICT.
  Regarding the stack-size thing, the closest thing in GCC is 
frame-larger-than. Since we cannot, AFAIK, set an integer value to a warning in 
clang, we cannot match this for now.

  @Hal
  I do not have a good answer for the demangling of function’s name in the 
reporting. I believe this could be addressed later and in probably a better way 
by front-end people.
  In other words, we can make a RFC for this after this specific plumbing lands.
  The bottom line is, I do not think we should hold on this patch because of 
that.

  Thanks for your feedbacks.

  -Quentin

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2430
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to