I'm not sure why "replace" is the right interface. Wouldn't it be better to just have an AnalysisDiagClients entry for "no default PathDiagnosticConsumers", and then be able to add to them?
I'm also still not convinced that you really need a //new// PathDiagnosticConsumer, rather than, say, improving the text diagnostics. http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
