On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:31 , Benjamin Kramer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 03.02.2014, at 18:25, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can't we just always provide a RangeEnd? For single-token types it should be >> the same as the start location, but that's fine. (Assuming these are token >> ranges, not character ranges.) > > Not sure if I understand. If the type has a name the range end should point > at the name token. If we take the location from the type it won't cover the > entire parameter. Ah, I'm sorry, I misread the code to be a shortcut for types, not decls. Looks correct. Jordan
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
