On 17 February 2014 18:22, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Explicit soft-float makes sense for e.g. kernel use, even if the target
> is *hf.

That's a good point, but the conflict is that there is already an
option "-float-abi=hard" and I didn't want to add "+soft-float-abi" to
avoid conflicting behaviour.

Should I remove the -floag-abi=hard parameter AND add +soft-float-abi?

--renato
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to