On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:47:55 -0800 Saleem Abdulrasool <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Turner > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:47:37 -0800 > > Saleem Abdulrasool <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Isn't gnueabihf equivalent to gnueabi with the difference being > > > that it uses the hardfloat ABI? If so, why are you > > > conditionalising the exception model based on gnueabihf? > > > > The code to select the exception model was already checking if it is > > building for EABI or GNU EABI. This patch adds gnueabihf to that > > check. > > > Ah, of course, the gnueabihf is an EABI compatible environment, so it > should be using EHABI for the exception model. > > LGTM. Is anyone able to commit this? Andrew _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
