================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:12955-12956
@@ -12954,4 +12954,4 @@
// it needs to go into the function scope.
- if (InFunctionDeclarator)
+ if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && InFunctionDeclarator)
DeclsInPrototypeScope.push_back(Enum);
----------------
Richard Smith wrote:
> In `ActOnTag` we have this condition:
>
> if (S->isFunctionPrototypeScope() && !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
> InFunctionDeclarator && Name)
>
> Is there a good reason for these to be different?
>
> (I'm not particularly happy that `InFunctionDeclarator` is nonzero in the
> case where we've switched out of function declarator scope -- can you also
> update the comment in Sema.h to indicate that this value may be inaccurate in
> C++?)
> Is there a good reason for these to be different?
After digging into this some more, I think this logic only needs to be in
ActOnTag since it handles all tag types. I was also able to simplify the logic
by relying only on scopes to determine when we are in prototype scope and
getting rid of InFunctionDeclarator.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2742
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits