On Feb 26, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >> On Feb 26, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Hal Finkel <hfin...@anl.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Remarks should often indicate things that are good (like this loop was >>> vectorized), >>> and so upgrading remarks to errors will only make sense for 'negative' >>> remarks. >> >> Each remark should have its own identifier, so people can choose to upgrade >> them >> or not. It’s not worth the complexity to try to add another level or >> behavior for >> “positive remarks”. > > Hear hear hear hear hear. > > ------------- > > Going off on an ambitious tangent here: If we were able to remove the existing diagnostic flags, doing these changes might be nice. However, since we can’t, this would just a lot of complexity without making the world better :-) -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
