On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:52:55AM -0800, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I also think that it is ultimately a mistake to re-use the same > > commandline > > > syntax for remarks. While I'd rather re-use all the infrastructure, I'd > > > rather separate these into a different spelling eventually. > > > > +1. Our current logic around -W* flags is already complex enough (to > > understand -- both for users and developers, to extend and to > > maintain), and overloading the meaning of -W* for remarks will only > > make it even more complex, and possibly confusing as well (it is well > > established that -W* flags enable warnings). > > > Ya know, -R* flags don't appear to be in use in the GCC commandline at all. > I'm liking the idea of taking over that capital letter for remarks-related > flags more.
Please don't. It is a linker flag that has historically often been passed without -Wl to gcc. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
