On Mar 5, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Yaron Keren <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Systems without fmaf will very likely miss fmal and all the C99 functions, so > they have many other problems to worry about. > > LGTM. Thanks! Committed revision 202990. > One question, though. Why > > using ::fma; > using ::fmaf; > > but not > > using ::fmal; > > This is not fma specific question - cmath repeats this pattern for all C99 > functions. > Shouldn't all three version treated the same? I don’t know. I’ve put investigating this on my to-do list; <cmath> is due some pretty serious work in the future, mostly due to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18218 , and I’ll make sure that I deal with it then. — Marshall _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
