On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:43 PM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hmm, OK. It seems LLVM developers were/are generally happy to remove
> those returns after fully covered switches - it comes up quite often
> in code review and we diligently remove them. Do we want to
> validate/promote it? (any that are in I suspect are a matter of
> oversight rather than deliberate preference)
>
> But I guess they're harmless enough to not be worth the warning, maybe...
No, you’re right. The warning fires MANY times on the LLVM codebase in this
case, but I agree it is worth leaving in.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
