Other than the one test that I commented on, this looks ok to me.
================
Comment at: test/extensions/hash/specializations.fail.cpp:16
@@ +15,3 @@
+{
+ assert(__gnu_cxx::hash<std::string>()("") == 0); // error
+}
----------------
Now about
assert(__gnu_cxx::hash<std::string>()(std::string()) == 0); // error
instead?
That way you can't get caught up with implicit conversions.
[ I don't think it will matter, but I've been caught out before by failing
tests failing, but for the wrong reason. ]
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2747
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
