On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:00:32PM -0000, Hans Wennborg wrote: > >> Author: hans > >> Date: Wed Mar 12 17:00:32 2014 > >> New Revision: 203722 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=203722&view=rev > >> Log: > >> MS intrinsics: implement the __movs and __stos intrinsics (PR19054) > > > > Why is this not just mapping them to __builtin_memmove / > > __builtin_memset? > > I figured someone using these intrinsics would want the exact "rep > movs" and "rep stos" generated, and I don't think our builtins > guarantee that. If that doesn't matter, I'm fine with using the > builtins. I think given the names of these builtins, that is a reasonable assumption (sadly).
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
