FYI, GCC seems to use curly braces for some diagnostics:
given:
namespace { int x; }
namespace { int x; }
GCC outputs:
error: redefinition of 'int {anonymous}::x'
Personally, I like the curly braces more than the parens.
Just my two cents on the issue.
On Wed Mar 12 2014 at 4:51:39 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:08 AM, David Blaikie <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Partly out of consistency with GCC's anonymous namespace rendering
>> ("(anonymous namespace)") and just a desire not to have angle brackets
>> be confused with a template argument list, this patch changes all our
>> anonymous things to use parens.
>>
>> Not entirely consistent with GCC (GCC still uses angles for
>> "<anonymous struct>" and other cases), but Chandler and Richard seemed
>> to prefer consistency between the different kinds of names, rather
>> than consistency with GCC here.
>>
>> I haven't added an actual debug info test, though that was my initial
>> motivation - I can add one if someone thinks that's valuable.
>>
>> Any other thoughts?
>
>
> Looking through the testcase updates, my gut reaction is that I find the
> ()s uglier than the <>s (maybe because it's more obvious that the <>s are
> not real language syntax?)... but I'm sure I'll get over it :)
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
