> They're not keywords, they're weird ways of spelling things like && and |.
> Under MSVC compat mode, we should not recognize them at all (MSVC doesn't do
> so in its default mode, and appears to treat them as macros in its
> "conforming" mode).
In that case, something like the following should return true if the operator
token is to be recognized. Right?
bool isSpecialOperatorToken(IdentifierInfo *II)
{
if (LangOpts.MSVCCompat)
return false;
return II->isCPlusPlusOperatorKeyword();
}
> You could instead provide an __is_identifier, which I think might be what
> you're really looking for here ("is this token usable as an identifier?").
True, but I would prefer if it is called something else.
All the other __has_***() methods return true if the given parameter is
something special, whereas it seems that __is_identifier() would return
false if something is special (hence not an identifier).
Maybe __has_special_token(parameter)?
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3034
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
