Neither of these tests should require LP64. This is probably a silly bug in them. What's the nature of the failure?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:55 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]>wrote: > Author: chapuni > Date: Mon Mar 17 06:55:46 2014 > New Revision: 204038 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204038&view=rev > Log: > clang/test/CXX/drs: Add "REQUIRES:LP64" to a couple of tests in r204033. > [PR8833] > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr412.cpp > cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr4xx.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr412.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr412.cpp?rev=204038&r1=204037&r2=204038&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr412.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr412.cpp Mon Mar 17 06:55:46 2014 > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ > // lwg404: yes > // lwg2340: yes > > +// REQUIRES: LP64 > typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; > namespace std { struct bad_alloc {}; } > int x; > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr4xx.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr4xx.cpp?rev=204038&r1=204037&r2=204038&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr4xx.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr4xx.cpp Mon Mar 17 06:55:46 2014 > @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ namespace dr428 { // dr428: yes > } > > namespace dr429 { // dr429: yes c++11 > + // REQUIRES: LP64 > // FIXME: This rule is obviously intended to apply to C++98 as well. > typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; > struct A { > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
