On 03/24/2014 03:22 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote:
On 03/24/2014 11:46 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote:
Of course, this also assumes address space 0 is generic. This is
currently true for the in-tree targets and CUDA/OpenCL support in
Clang, but I don't believe its a set rule anywhere.
R600 wants this optimization, except the "generic" address space isn't
0, and is instead some other currently undefined number.
Sounds like good justification for making this a target-independent
pass, then.
Jingyue, is there anything in clang now that would prevent the generic
address space from being a number other than 0?
-Matt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
