Author: marshall
Date: Tue Mar 25 09:57:05 2014
New Revision: 204724
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204724&view=rev
Log:
Mark LWG issues #2075 and #2142 as complete. 2142 was a change to the standard
to remove redundant wording, which required no changes to libc++. 2075 was a
rewrite of the requirements for forward progress, and again, requires no changes
to the library.
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html?rev=204724&r1=204723&r2=204724&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html Tue Mar 25 09:57:05 2014
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2135";>2135</a></td><td>Unclear
requirement for exceptions thrown in
condition_variable::wait()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2291";>2291</a></td><td>std::hash
is vulnerable to collision DoS
attack</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2142";>2142</a></td><td>packaged_task::operator()
synchronization too broad?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2142";>2142</a></td><td>packaged_task::operator()
synchronization too broad?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2240";>2240</a></td><td>Probable
misuse of term "function scope" in
[thread.condition]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2252";>2252</a></td><td>Strong
guarantee on vector::push_back() still broken with
C++11?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2257";>2257</a></td><td>Simplify
container requirements with the new
algorithms</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
@@ -267,12 +267,12 @@
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2360";>2360</a></td><td>reverse_iterator::operator*()
is unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104";>2104</a></td><td>unique_lock
move-assignment should not be
noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186";>2186</a></td><td>Incomplete
action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075";>2075</a></td><td>Progress
guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling
assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075";>2075</a></td><td>Progress
guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling
assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288";>2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent
requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<!-- <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->
</table>
- <p>Last Updated: 24-Mar-2014</p>
+ <p>Last Updated: 25-Mar-2014</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
