On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Raul Silvera <[email protected]> wrote:
> How about an FNV hash? That is very simple to implement, fast, and will be > stronger at detecting changes. FNV looks great; thanks! I’ll resubmit with FNV-1a [1]. http://isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/fnv/#FNV-1a > Should the hashing computation be split from PGO into its own utility? Having > a general hashing for functions may have other uses; in particular MergeFunc > comes to mind. Good idea. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
