On 30.03.2014 19:35, Reid Kleckner wrote:
> Should we be more specific here? Something like:
> redeclaration %0 adds attribute %1 which was missing the previous
> declaration
Sounds like a good idea. I would phrase it: "redeclaration of %q0 may
not add %q1 attribute" (or rather "cannot"?) which would look like:
t.cpp:222:28: error: redeclaration of 'X::f' may not add 'dllexport'
attribute
__declspec(dllexport) void X::f() {}
^
t.cpp:219:6: note: previous declaration is here
void f();
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
