On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 22/04/2014 00:31, Alp Toker wrote: > >> I'm not really opposed to the idea, though. I just found the current >>> version easier to use. >>> >> >> I recommend not modifying the Diag() signature because the feature will >> be unavailable to other modules until they each update their own Diag() >> signatures introducing latent churn. >> > > To be clear, my concern is that other developers will propagate this over > time to other Diag() functions as they would have to to be able to use it > -- a problem that a fluent extension to DiagnosticBuilder wouldn't suffer > from. >
No problem. I don't really care what it uses, as long as I can get the behaviour I want from the system. I'll change it to use a manipulator, as you folks agreed downthread. Patch coming up. Diego.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
