On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Hal Finkel <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, this is reasonable, but I'm still not sure it should be in a pragma > called 'vectorize'. This particular transformation can be applied (and more > often than not is applied) to scalar code. Strictly speaking it is an > optimization that exposes ILP, and has little to do with vectorization.
This is a good point. Maybe ILP would be a better name? > > That having been said, the fact that the correctness model for this > 'widening' operation is similar (although not identical) to that for > vectorization, and thus implemented by the vectorizer, is not facet of the > implementation we should expose to the user. However, pragma widen is fine > with me too.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
