Looks good.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Justin Bogner <[email protected]>wrote: > We previously treated ARM separately from the generic Itanium ABI for > initializing guard variables. This code duplication led to things like > the ARM path missing the memory barrier for threadsafe handling, and a > highly misleading comment about how we were (mis)using the generic ABI > for ARM64 when really it went through the ARM codepath. > > This unifies the two code paths. Functionally, this changes the ARM and > ARM64 codepath to use one byte loads instead of 4 and 8, respectively, > and adds the missing atomic acquire to these loads. Other architectures > are unchanged. > > Okay to commit? > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
