On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Kaelyn Takata <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Author: rikka >> Date: Thu May 1 16:15:24 2014 >> New Revision: 207796 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=207796&view=rev >> Log: >> When sorting overload candidates, sort arity mismatches in ascending >> order by the number of missing or extra parameters. This is useful if >> there are more than a few overload candidates with arity mismatches, >> particularly in the presence of -fshow-overloads=best. >> > > This is awesome, thank you! > My pleasure! When I looked at CompareOverloadCandidatesForDisplay, I was amazed that the arity mismatches were sorted after everything else but weren't being sorted relative to each other. ;)
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
