Yes, I think that would be a problem. However, this particular failing test case doesn't involve the field name; rather it involves the field's type. So I think a closer parallel would be
message class {
optional int32 foo = 1;
}
message bar {
optional class c = 1;
}
How would the proto compiler handle that?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3634
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
