I think it is, it makes the behavior consistent independent of the superfluous semicolon at the end. I can add a test case in one of my next commits.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tobias Grosser <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/05/2014 13:20, Daniel Jasper wrote: > >> Why is this using an elaborated return type? Can you just remove the >> "struct"? >> > > I just rebuilt clang-format and I found another formatting change: > > - ReportFuncCall(Instruction *Inst) : Inst(Inst) { > - ++BadFuncCallForScop; > - }; > + ReportFuncCall(Instruction *Inst) : Inst(Inst) { ++BadFuncCallForScop; > }; <- This is just one line > > Was this intentional as well? In case it was, maybe it is worth adding > some non-js tests here. > > Tobias >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
