On 8 May 2014 17:29, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ugh. Didn't realize LLDB still had that assert text there. That's > grossly misleading.
Note though that I didn't encounter LLDB's "suggestion" in the path I took to the clang assertion. Perhaps it's a difference between forward declarations (as in the mailing list thread) vs. the "debug info only where the vtable is" optimization that I presumably encountered. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
