I think expected-no-diagnostics goes with -verify on the run line. On May 13, 2014 5:22 PM, "Aaron Ballman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: aaronballman > Date: Tue May 13 10:14:59 2014 > New Revision: 208703 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=208703&view=rev > Log: > Updated the test case to show that no diagnostics are expected, and not > require emitting the AST until after the AST printing for statement > attributes is updated. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/PCH/stmt-attrs.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/PCH/stmt-attrs.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/PCH/stmt-attrs.cpp?rev=208703&r1=208702&r2=208703&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/PCH/stmt-attrs.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/PCH/stmt-attrs.cpp Tue May 13 10:14:59 2014 > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t.a %s > -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -include-pch %t.a %s -ast-print -o - | > FileCheck %s > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -include-pch %t.a %s > +// expected-no-diagnostics > > #ifndef HEADER > #define HEADER > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
