FWIW, we (a few people at Google working on CUDA PTX target) are looking to
build on this patch to support a loop unrolling pragma, eg: #pragma loop
unroll(...).  Thanks for making our job easier :-)  I know some others on
this thread had expressed interest in a similar feature.  I intend to work
on the unroll pragma as soon as this patch is in, so if anyone else is
already working on this please let me know.

thanks,
Mark


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Alexander Musman <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I've just committed my change with emission of the loop metadata for
> vectorizer for 'omp simd' (in r209411) and I think that in some follow-up
> patch it would be good to do a change to use the same code path in both
> (i.e. use CGLoopInfo to emit loop metadata for all vectorizing pragmas).
> Actually, if '#pragma loop vectorize' will get a clause for marking
> loads/stores loop-parallel, it is good idea to reuse it anyway.
>
> Alexander
>
>
> 2014-05-20 20:12 GMT+04:00 Tyler Nowicki <[email protected]>:
>
>> Ping.
>>
>> On May 14, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Tyler Nowicki <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Alexey, Aaron,
>> >
>> > Thanks for the review. Richard and John please review the attached
>> patch.
>> >
>> > Tyler
>> >
>> > <pragma_loop-svn.patch>
>> >
>> > On May 13, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Alexey Bataev <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I think CodeGen part of the patch should be reviewed by  John McCall.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to