Chris, Not sure my opinion weights much, but I, personally, do consider you to be qualified and we (speaking on behalf of Intel team working on OpenMP) do appreciate your code reviews -- especially given how few members of the community have time / inclination to review OpenMP patches. Please keep the reviews coming!
As for what is necessary for actually letting a patch to be committed, I let more established members of clang / llvm community to decide -- though in my (again, probably not very important) opinion the situation is quickly coming to a deadlock. Which is quite sad. :-( Andrey On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:59 AM, C. Bergström <[email protected]>wrote: > Ok so I'm not qualified and won't be commenting on future patches. Thanks > for the clarification > > _______________________________________________ > Openmp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
