On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I noticed that
> clang\test\CXX\basic\basic.lookup\basic.lookup.qual\p6-0x.cpp
> is XFAILed for all targets with the comment "Our C++0x doesn't
> currently have specialized destructor name handling, since the
> specification is still in flux."
>
> That seems a bit outdated. From looking at the standard, I believe
> this test should be unXFAILed, the comment removed, and
> expected-no-diagnostics added to the test. The contents of the test
> are:
>
> struct C {
> typedef int I;
> };
>
> typedef int I1, I2;
> extern int* p;
> extern int* q;
>
> void f() {
> p->C::I::~I();
> q->I1::~I2();
> }
>
> struct A {
> ~A();
> };
>
> typedef A AB;
> int main() {
> AB *p;
> p->AB::~AB();
> }
>
> Any disagreement with that direction?
Sounds good to me. There's some weirdnesses with cv-qualifiers in the C++11
rules, but we have a core issue to get them fixed (core issue 1920), and
that doesn't affect this test.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
