> > That should read "default-constructed". > Could you elaborate? English is not my native language and grepping the source code didn't produce anything useful.
> The message can be made shorter by dropping the first half without losing > value -- the source location is sufficiently informative. > I don't think it's obvious without the first part but I'll change it if you insist? I've just noticed that 'omitted element' probably needs a plural version. > It's unconventional to use 'was' when describing semantic analysis results. How about 'parameter 0% was not declared' or 'unnamed type used in template argument was declared here'. There are many others and to me they feel more natural, but again I'm not a native speaker. I actually don't like that terse mechanical voice compilers often have.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
