On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Nico Rieck <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30.05.2014 23:58, Richard Smith wrote: > > "what linkage would MSVC give to an explicit specialization of a function > > template under normal circumstances (no dllimport/dllexport attributes)? > > Does it treat them as mergeable, like an inline function, or as a strong > > definition?" > > They get strong linkage. > OK, then it would seem wrong to treat them as being implicitly inline. It seems that CodeGen (or one of the GVALinkage-related properties it asks the ASTContext about) should detect dllimport explicit specializations, instead, more like your original patch did. But I don't see that this should be at all linked with the ABI -- it seems to be just a weird quirk of the dllimport attribute?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
