Hi Renato, > Though, I thought we already had EHABI unwinding working... Is this in addition to Logan's work?
Yes. This is the work to reduce the dependency on libgcc (by providing our own libunwind.) Best regards, Logan On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Renato Golin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 June 2014 00:28, Albert Wong (王重傑) <[email protected]> wrote: > > FYI, this is an incremental patch. The VFP support is still being fully > > validated but there will be a followup patch soon. If you'd prefer, we > can > > push all of the VFP and core register bits at once. It'll be a bigish > patch > > though. > > If that means full implementation of all types at once, I think it'd > be better. The size is more boilerplate than actual logic, so it > should be simpler to review one big lump of new functions than > incremental differences thereafter. > > Though, I thought we already had EHABI unwinding working... Is this in > addition to Logan's work? > > --renato >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
