On Jun 16, 2014, at 8:51 , Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> +def CXXPre1zCompat : DiagGroup<"c++98-c++11-c++14-compat">; > +def CXXPre1zCompatPedantic : DiagGroup<"c++98-c++11-c++14-compat-pedantic", > + [CXXPre1zCompat]>; I'm not happy with this warning name. Can we say the *compat options are just the newest version? c++14-compat? Alternately, we could have backwards names and forwards names: c++1z-compat for forwards compatibility warnings and pre-c++1z-compat for backwards compatibility warnings? Jordan
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
