On Jun 24, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Alp Toker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please split out and name the new dotted form something like >>>> "-msc-full-version" to avoid ambiguity. >>> >>> >>> I was inclinded to overload the option because it means we don't have to >>> diagnose this case: -fmsc-version -fmsc-full-version=17.00.0. We just do >>> the obvious thing of "last one always wins". Diagnosing the conflict isn't >>> too hard, though, so let's just split the options and do exactly that in the >>> driver. >>> >> >> I'm inclined to agree with this. We could also even deprecate the >> original option and have the new option have exactly the semantics we >> want. Aaron? > > If we deprecate the original option and warn when the options are > combined in the meantime, then I'd be okay with splitting the options. I think this makes it more palatable for me as well. This just leaves the question of bike shedding: -fmsc-version-ex? :-) > ~Aaron > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits -- Saleem Abdulrasool abdulras (at) fb (dot) com _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
