Thank you for review.
2014-06-24 23:24 GMT+07:00 Richard Smith <[email protected]>: > LGTM > > ================ > Comment at: test/SemaCXX/type-definition-in-specifier.cpp:44 > @@ +43,3 @@ > + void func4(struct t19018 {int qq;} x); // expected-error{{cannot be > defined in a parameter type}} > + void func5(struct {int qq;} x); // expected-error{{cannot be defined in > a parameter type}} > +}; > ---------------- > Does this still work if you put something more complex into the struct > definition? (For instance, if it tries to reference a member of the > surrounding struct, or if it has member functions, or similar.) > It still works, corresponding testcases are added. However, access to a member of the surrounding struct is resolved as for nested types, the code: struct aaa { int xx; void func5(struct { int qq() { return xx; }; } x); }; produces also a message: error: use of non-static data member 'xx' of 'aaa' from nested type '' I don't know if this behavior need to be fixed, as type defined in prototype itself is erroneous. Thanks, --Serge http://reviews.llvm.org/D4145 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
