strager added a comment.
(Sorry for the late feedback.)
================
Comment at: docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:221
@@ -220,2 +220,3 @@
-**AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType**
(``DefinitionReturnTypeBreakingStyle``)
+**AlwaysBreakAfterDeclarationReturnType** (``ReturnTypeBreakingStyle``)
+ The function declaration return type breaking style to use.
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Do you think it'll ever make sense to break differently for declarations and
> definitions? I think having two entirely independent configuration flags
> gives us 9 combinations (assuming the three enum values will remain) out of
> which many will never be used.
>
> I see two alternatives:
> Add an additional bool flag "TreatDeclarationsLikeDefinitions" (name might
> not be ideal yet).
> Change existing flag name to AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType and use five enum
> values (None, TopLevel, All, TopLevelDefinitions, AllDefinitions).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Sorry for being very picky on this. The problem is that these options stick
> around for a long time and we need to think about them carefully.
> I think having two entirely independent configuration flags gives us 9
> combinations (assuming the three enum values will remain) out of which many
> will never be used.
I agree that many combinations will be unused. I don't see why we should
conflate the two if they are configured independently in practice, though.
> Add an additional bool flag "TreatDeclarationsLikeDefinitions" (name might
> not be ideal yet).
> Change existing flag name to AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType and use five enum
> values (None, TopLevel, All, TopLevelDefinitions, AllDefinitions).
What about styles where declarations have return types on their own line, but
definitions don't? I don't see a reason to prevent that style.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:129-132
@@ -128,5 +128,6 @@
if (Current.is(TT_FunctionDeclarationName) &&
Style.AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType == FormatStyle::DRTBS_None &&
+ Style.AlwaysBreakAfterDeclarationReturnType == FormatStyle::DRTBS_None &&
State.Column < 6)
return false;
----------------
djasper wrote:
> What do you mean exactly?
See `IsDefinition` in `lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp` introduced by this diff.
The logic here and there should match, I think.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10370
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
