jroelofs added a subscriber: EricWF.

================
Comment at: include/__config:742
@@ +741,3 @@
+#ifndef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS
+# if defined(__FreeBSD__) || \
+    defined(__NetBSD__) || \
----------------
espositofulvio wrote:
> theraven wrote:
> > espositofulvio wrote:
> > > jroelofs wrote:
> > > > espositofulvio wrote:
> > > > > jroelofs wrote:
> > > > > > jroelofs wrote:
> > > > > > > @espositofulvio: @ed meant this:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ```
> > > > > > > #ifndef _WIN32
> > > > > > > #  include <unistd.h>
> > > > > > > #  if _POSIX_THREADS > 0
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > #  endif
> > > > > > > #endif
> > > > > > > ```
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Which //is// the correct way to test for this.
> > > > > > That being said, there have been discussions before about whether 
> > > > > > or not we should #include <unistd.h> in <__config>, with the 
> > > > > > conclusion being that we shouldn't.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It would be better if this were a CMake configure-time check that 
> > > > > > sets _LIBCPP_THREAD_API, rather than these build-time guards.
> > > > > Tried adding that as configure time checks, but then libcxxabi fails 
> > > > > to compile because of the guard in __config to check that 
> > > > > _LIBCPP_THREAD_API has beed defined when _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS is 
> > > > > not. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > As a side note: Is Windows the only OS which hasn't got unistd.h?
> > > > > Tried adding that as configure time checks...
> > > > 
> > > > Can you put the patch for that up on gist.github.com, or a pastebin?... 
> > > > I'll take a look.
> > > > 
> > > > > As a side note: Is Windows the only OS which hasn't got unistd.h?
> > > > 
> > > > For the platforms libcxx currently builds on, yes.
> > > > Can you put the patch for that up on gist.github.com, or a pastebin?... 
> > > > I'll take a look.
> > > 
> > > It's here https://gist.github.com/espositofulvio/eac2fb08acf2e430c516
> > I'm sorry to have triggered this bikeshed.  Given that, of the currently 
> > supported platforms, Windows is the only one where we want to use threads 
> > but don't want to use PTHREADS, I think it's fine to have this check be 
> > !WIN32.  The important thing is having the check *in one place* so that the 
> > person who wants to add the *second* non-pthread threading implementation 
> > doesn't have a load of different places to look: they can just change it in 
> > `__config` and then chase all of the compile failures.
> Given that it's something I suggested in a comment on the first revision, I 
> was happy to try it out. It was also a quick change. Unfortunately it brakes 
> libcxxabi build (at least the way I've done it), so I'm happy to make the 
> change if @jroelofs finds another way 
I meant something like this: 
https://gist.github.com/jroelofs/279cb2639ad910b953d2

... which doesn't quite work yet, but should give you the idea. I don't know 
how to get CMake to treat `${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/include/c++/v1` as the includes 
directory instead of `${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/../include`. Maybe @ericwf 
can help with that?

Basically the idea is that we have cmake create a __config_site header which 
__config includes.  This new header would then have the definitions for these 
kinds of configure-time decisions.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D11781



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to