chandlerc added a comment. I agree with both Marshall and Hal.
However, I'm also not opposed to platforms opting out if this if they want to. If a particular platform wants to define the behavior of null pointers passed to these functions, that seems like a reasonable thing to support here. The two platforms that seem interested in supporting null pointers here are Android and FreeBSD, so I think we should disable this for those platforms. But I want to point out and emphasize what Hal said: the compiler can *already do this*. Please make sure that both of those platforms configure Clang and LLVM to specially handle these routines to support null pointers. You're providing a conforming extension for your platform, but you can't *just* do that in the STL, you need to do that at every layer of the toolchain. For Linux, given the *very* long precedent of glibc and GCC behavior, I'm confident we want these annotations. I'll let folks that actually support other platforms chime up for the cases they care about. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11948 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
