hfinkel added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D11815#224161, @echristo wrote:
> Hi Hal, > > No, TargetOptions is exactly the wrong place to handle this due to wanting to > have various functions compiled with and without a force aligned stack at the > IR level that might not hold up at LTO time. No, that's not a problem. The code in lib/Target/TargetMachine.cpp (specifically via the RESET_OPTION macro), resets the target options based on the function attributes. > -eric http://reviews.llvm.org/D11815 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
