EricWF added a comment. Thanks for doing all of this work. It's really appreciated.
First, I don't really think we should have the notion of a "minor" ABI version. It will be hard enough to maintain 2 major versions and I don't understand what a minor ABI version buys us. In my opinion libc++ should support the following ABI configurations: 1. Previous: The previous major ABI version. 2. Default: The current major ABI version. 3. Unstable: The current major ABI version + all pending ABI breaking changes. I would like to see the ABI minor version replaced with `_LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE` macro that @mclow.lists originally proposed. http://reviews.llvm.org/D11740 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
