piotrdz added a comment.
@Eugene: I don't understand, what does declaring function with "void" argument
have in common with this review? I only check here variable declarations inside
functions.
Maybe you meant my other review for inconsistent declaration parameter names?
If so, this is how it behaves currently:
$ cat test.c
void allright();
void allright(void);
void notallright(int a);
void notallright(int b);
$ clang-tidy -checks='-*,readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name'
test.c -- -std=c11
1 warning generated.
/work/clang-trunk/test.c:4:6: warning: function 'notallright' has other
declaration with different parameter name(s)
[readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name]
void notallright(int a);
^
/work/clang-trunk/test.c:5:6: note: other declaration seen here
void notallright(int b);
So I see no reason to add specific checks for functions with "void" parameter,
unless you see something wrong with this behavior?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12473
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
