I don't know of anyone who has a stake in clang-modernize and I probably should be removed from the code-owner role.
On 2 September 2015 at 12:48, Manuel Klimek <kli...@google.com> wrote: > I think that basically encodes what the current state is, and we should > have kept that file in a better shape. +Edwin in case he still has a stake > in clang-modernize, or knows who might have. > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:38 PM Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> > wrote: > >> I happened to notice that CODE_OWNERS.TXT for clang-tools-extra is >> rather sparse. These tools are starting to get more attention from the >> community, and I am wondering whether it would make sense to populate >> that somewhat? If so, I would nominate: >> >> Alexander Kornienko for clang-tidy >> Peter Collingbourne for clang-query >> Manuel Klimek for clang-rename, and clang-tools-extra as a whole >> >> I'm basing these nominations on who is actively maintaining the tools >> already. >> >> ~Aaron >> > -- Edwin V
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
