The (vague) idea was to make clear that the header is *not* part of cuda distribution.
That said, the file could use a better name. Do any of these sound better? * fix_cuda_headers.h * adapt_cuda_headers.h * cuda_shim.h --Artem On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> wrote: > echristo added a comment. > > Bikeshed: it's part of the clang headers, do we really need "clang" in the > header name? > > -eric > > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D13171 > > > > -- --Artem Belevich
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
