Author: marshall
Date: Mon Oct 5 15:21:54 2015
New Revision: 249347
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=249347&view=rev
Log:
Mark 2072 as complete; we already do this
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html?rev=249347&r1=249346&r2=249347&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/kona.html Mon Oct 5 15:21:54 2015
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
<table id="issues" border="1">
<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue
Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#1169";>1169</a></td><td><tt>num_get</tt>
not fully compatible with <tt>strto*</tt></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2072";>2072</a></td><td>Unclear
wording about capacity of temporary buffers</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2072";>2072</a></td><td>Unclear
wording about capacity of temporary
buffers</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2101";>2101</a></td><td>Some
transformation types can produce impossible
types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2111";>2111</a></td><td>Which
<tt>unexpected</tt>/<tt>terminate</tt> handler is called from the
exception handling runtime?</td><td>Kona</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a
href="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2119";>2119</a></td><td>Missing
<tt>hash</tt> specializations for extended integer
types</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
<li>1169 - We currently have a single function __num_get_float that calls
strtold_l, and then casts down to the appropriate floating point type. That
will have to change.</li>
-<li>2072 - I don't think there's anything to do here; this is just making the
wording better.</li>
+<li><i>2072 - We already do this; this is just making the wording
better.</i></li>
<li>2101 - Need to write some careful test cases. In particular, need to check
function types with/without const/ref qualifiers. Currently we get this wrong.
Installing metashell to play with these.</li>
<li><i>2111 - Resolved an ambiguity by calling it out. No code change
required.</i></li>
<li>2119 - Hashes for all integral and enumeration types. Research needed</li>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
