alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15411#307274, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D15411#307030, @alexfh wrote: > > > BTW, Richard, is the possibility of assignment of an integer to a > > std::string a bug in the standard? > > > This is the result of: > > basic_string& operator=(charT c); > Returns: *this = basic_string(1,c). > > > So I believe it is by design. I see how the current behavior can be explained by the standard, however I'm not sure this was the intention of the standard to specifically allow this behavior. And if it's unintended (and I'd say undesired), the standard could also be changed to enforce a mechanism to disallow assignment of std::string from other integer types (e.g. a templated deleted operator= enable_if'd for all integral types except for charT, or something like that). Maybe it wouldn't be reasonable for some reason, but it's worth trying ;) http://reviews.llvm.org/D15411 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
